Posted on March 1, 2008 in Prostate cancer by adminNo Comments »

My father has cancer(prostate) and this morning a scan was done and was told told the cancer spread to the brain what are the results of this and what are the implications|||I%26#039;m no expert, and I%26#039;m truly sorry for this happening to your father. But its not good. However, there have been amazing things happening in cancer treatment. You have to convince him to fight this with every bit of fight he can muster. Diet, Chemo, radiation, new experimental stuff, and brain surgery if its an operable tumor. I would also be concerned with it going to the liver and lung. usually, I believe it goes there before brain, but I%26#039;m no doctor, just had a lot of friends and family suffer the disease. My father in Law had prostate cancer first, then colon, then bladder,then lung. Hes still alive after about 7 years and fights it with the greatest and bravest attitude I have ever seen. And I whine about a getting the flu. Just hang in there, always be positive around him, use the internet to search out new treatments. When he got prostate cance we searched the internet and found out about seeding. Where they place radioactive bb%26#039;s in the area of cancer. The doctors around here knew nothing about it, or didn%26#039;t mention it. But from my wifes dilegence she found a cancer clinic in louisville KY that did the proceedure. good luck and god bless|||If it has spread to the brain, unfortunately, in most cases it it terminal. My father had lung cancer that spread to the brain. I can%26#039;t remember how long after it being detected in the brain before he passed away, but it wasn%26#039;t very long. May I suggest you find the book or audio tape by Dr Bernie Segel called %26quot;The power of love and laughter in healing%26quot;. It is an awesome book and deals with many aspects of terminal illness. It helped me a great deal in dealing with my Father%26#039;s Illness. Best wishes to you and so sorry to hear that news.|||You need to consult a neurologist. If it has spread than it is a stage 4 cancer and very difficult to treat The only person who can really answer your question is the doctors involved. In general, when it spreads to that level it tends to have a poor outcome but I can%26#039;t be the one to answer that because there are always new treatments available. I know it is hard but you need to wait for the scan and find out exactly what is going on and the treatment options as well as the prognosis. Try to stay positive and we will be praying for you and your family for a good outcome.|||my mum was suddenly ill with a lump in her stomach and a lump that appeared on her forhead,7 days later they found it was stomach and brain cancer,my mum died straight away ,she was a fit lady and this was so sudden ,i cant come to terms with it and i miss her so much xxxxxxxxx|||i answered your other question and now i see that it is prostate cancer that has spread to his brain. like some of the other people have said, cancer that spreads to the brain like that is not considered curable. however, prostate cancer is one of the slower-growing cancers and so often people with metastatic prostate cancer (prostate cancer that has spread) can live much longer than people with, for example, lung cancer that spreads to the brain.

your dad might benefit from radiation therapy to his brain if there are several spots, and other treatments such as neurosurgery, %26quot;stereotactic radiosurgery%26quot; if there is only one spot. your dad might also be placed on steroids to reduce any swelling that the cancer is causing in his brain.

i%26#039;m sorry to hear that he%26#039;s going through that.

Posted on March 1, 2008 in Prostate cancer by adminNo Comments »

Many men put this test off to check the prostate for cancer and enlargement. It%26#039;s important also to get the PSA blood test. Men are embarrassed sometimes, but woman get their PAP smears done.|||Yes

Posted on March 1, 2008 in Prostate cancer by adminNo Comments »

My father recently found out that he has prostate medistatic cancer which means that it has spread to his bones. There isn%26#039;t anything they can do to help him. He doesn%26#039;t have life insurance I now I am worried.|||I%26#039;m an insurance agent and to tell you the truth it%26#039;s really hard to find a company that will insure some one with an that condition. There are some exceptions thou, some insurance company%26#039;s can insure him but the monthly or yearly payment will be high. Try calling places like Farmers, Allstate and maybe even Geico… Try them best wishes|||Life insurance would not be available with cancer that has reached metastatic stage.

http://www.lifeinsuranceadviso… Report It
|||no, most insurance companies will not pay out on preexisting conditions or they will get a copy of your medical records. Sorry to hear about your Dad..|||I doubt very much that u will find insurance . I would focus on protecting assests should long term care or hospice is needed. Get an attorny to help protect whatever assets your family might have.|||There are alot of insurance companies that will help. Look for companies that don%26#039;t care about preexisting conditions. It takes some searching but you should find one.|||It would be subject to a medical assessment as to the effect of his disease on the likelihood of his death during the term of the policy. His doctor should be able to give some statistical guidance, eg the 5 year survival rate for his condition. Generally speaking, life insurance is only desirable as cover against a very low risk of death, or the premiums would be too high in relation to the cover.|||I know that Globe Life does not do a medical exam. I also did a search and found this link:

http://www.google.com/search?q=no%20medi…|||I%26#039;m sorry to hear about your father%26#039;s condition. This must be a difficult time for you.

It is not easy to find an insurance company that would offer coverage considering your father%26#039;s health condition. The best idea I can offer is to check with the best and biggest life insurance companies including Allstate, State Farm, Prudential and others.

Try to request a quote through InsureMe - they offer any options available through their network of top-rated life insurers that includes those listed above. To request a quote go to - http://www.insureme.com/landing.aspx?Ref…

Posted on March 1, 2008 in Prostate cancer by adminNo Comments »

I have high grade aggressive cancer of prostate. Have completed best available radiation. Cancer has not spread YET. diagnosed 2 yrs. ago. Please no answers involving GOD or RELIGION as these are not part of my lif. Thanks|||Some people believe that a person can be so in tune with their bodies, that they can heal themselves. I have no idea whether or not it is possible….|||Why would you disregard God at a time like this? Call on him from your pain and sorrow and he will hear you. Report It
|||I don%26#039;t know if you can %26quot;will%26quot; it away - but I think that having a positive attitude makes a really big difference. My mom has had breast cancer 3 times and she%26#039;s always kept an extremely positive attitude which has helped. She went 6 years between each bout. Report It
|||Somtimes doctors are very wrong in their diagnosis of how much time or quality of life some one has left.|||You can%26#039;t will away cancer, however if the cancer hasn%26#039;t spread from the prostate, what is to stop you from having your cancerous prostate removed like Rudy Giuliani did. Supposedly he was cured with this treatment option.

good luck.|||I think so. As long as you have hope anything can happen.|||I don%26#039;t believe personal will has a direct effect on cancer, however it can make a substantial difference in quality of life of the patient. Treatment is psychologically demanding and having a positive will can certainly make treatment less stressful.

But, no, I don%26#039;t believe will can cure cancer or prevent it from spreading.

Best of luck,

Lisa Fayed

http://cancer.about.com|||I think your mind plays a powerful part in any healing.

Posted on March 1, 2008 in Prostate cancer by adminNo Comments »

surgery was used to remove the prostate after finding cancer|||had my prostate removed 10 years ago and I still can get it up when I have to. It all depends all the surgery and how many nerves are cut during the procedure. Surgery procedures for the removal of the prostate have improved so much over the past 10 years that you shouldn%26#039;t have any problems afterwards. Just get rid of the cancer, like I did and enjoy your sex life.|||An erection is independant of a prostate|||Sorry. Only by mechanical means, or an implant.

Take my word.|||Your surgeon must have damaged the system that allows you to get hard. I would go see a different doctor to get an opinion on whether that happened. If it did, you will need to consider an implant of a device to help you.

Sorry that happened to you, dude.

Posted on March 1, 2008 in Prostate cancer by adminNo Comments »

late 1970%26#039;s%26#039; research on rare cancer findings. bladder and prostate|||http://www.google.com/search?client=safa…

Posted on March 1, 2008 in Prostate cancer by adminNo Comments »

…(e.g. skin cancer associated with cumulative sun exposure) you may have a greatly reduced risk of breast, colon, prostate and other solid cancers.

Hints:

http://www.mercola.com/2004/feb/11/vitam…

http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/3…

http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content…|||Hi Health Avenger

I see your interested in Health, but not sure what the question is here. Ill post some info on skin cancer Im aware of it. This is very powerful.

Research and Facts about the Dangers of Sunscreen

Being concerned about skin cancer is valid; however, most sunscreen products can do more harm than good. Some sunscreen products contain toxic chemicals that penetrate the skin, and can actually increase the risk of disease.

The following are a few highlighted remarks and findings by numerous experts whose research shows that many ingredients in sunscreen are simply not safe and should be avoided.

1. Allan C. Halpern, M.D. Chief of Dermatology at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

A nationally recognized dermatologist, Dr. Halpern has made significant contributions to predicting the frequency of the occurrence of skin cancer and dysplastic nevi (irregularly shaped moles that may become cancerous) in large populations. He is also an authority on early detection, tracking, and treatment of such skin changes to prevent them from progressing to advanced cancer. His work has led to the design of strategies for estimating a person%26#039;s risk of melanoma.

%26quot;Vitamin-D Research Turning Sunscreen Wisdom on Head%26quot;

Phoenix Arizona Republic Abstract, 22 May 2005

The thinking is that even if too much sun leads to the non-lethal skin cancer, too little sun may be worse. %26quot;I find the evidence that the sun prevents cancer to be mounting and increasingly compelling.%26quot; — Dr. Allan Halpern M.D., Dermatology Chief

Comment: The Chief of Dermatology at Memorial Sloan-Kettering has seen the scientific research and has the courage to admit that our past opinions about the sun appear to be wrong.

2. Samuel S. Epstein, M.D., author of The Politics of Cancer Revisited, is one of the foremost environmental toxicologists in the world. Epstein and his supporters point out that chemical sunscreens often contain toxic and even carcinogenic chemicals, proven to cause DNA mutation in laboratory studies — though it is still debatable whether they behave this way in human skin. Such chemicals include benzophenones, 4-MBC, placenta (and other estrogenic compounds), talc (a mineral similar to asbestos) and even that old stand-by PABA, which, though a nutrient in the B-vitamin family, produces potentially dangerous substances when activated by UV rays.

International Leading Authority on the Causes and Prevention of Cancer

Samuel S. Epstein, M.D. is professor emeritus of Environmental and Occupational Medicine at the University of Illinois School of Public Health, and Chairman of the Cancer Prevention Coalition. He has published some 260 peer reviewed articles, and authored or co-authored 11 books including: the prize-winning 1978 The Politics of Cancer; the 1995 Safe Shopper%26#039;s Bible; the 1998 Breast Cancer Prevention Program; the 1998 The Politics of Cancer, Revisited; the 2001 GOT (Genetically Engineered) MILK! The Monsanto rBGH/BST Milk Wars Handbook; the 2001 Unreasonable Risk. How to Avoid Cancer from Cosmetics and Personal Care Products: The Neways Story; and the 2005 Cancer-Gate: How to Win the Losing Cancer War.

Dr. Epstein is an internationally recognized authority on avoidable causes of cancer, particularly unknowing exposures to industrial carcinogens in air, water, the workplace, and consumer products–food, cosmetics and toiletries, and household products including pesticides–besides carcinogenic prescription drugs.

Biography http://www.preventcancer.com/about/epste…

Presentations and Events http://www.preventcancer.com/about/epste…

Awards http://www.preventcancer.com/about/epste…

Scientific Publications http://www.preventcancer.com/about/epste…

3. In 1998, Dr. Marianne Berwick, Epidemiologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, reported at a meeting that her analysis of 16 epidemiology studies suggested that the more sunscreen a person used the higher chance of developing skin cancer.

4. Dr. Frank Garland, of the University of California, believes the increased use of chemical sunscreens is the primary cause of the epidemic of skin cancer.

5. Gordon Ainsleigh, D.C. believes that the use of sunscreens causes more cancer deaths than it prevents. He estimated that the 17% increase in breast cancer observed between 1991 and 1992 may be the result of the pervasive use of sunscreens over the past decade. (Preventive Medicine, Vol. 22, Feb. 1993)

6. Professor John Moan, of the Norwegian Cancer Institute, found the yearly increase in melanoma in Norway had increased 350% for men and 440% for women from 1957-1984, when sunscreens were first introduced.

7. Drs. Cedric and Frank Garland, of the University of California, have pointed out that while sunscreens do prevent against sunburn there is no scientific proof they protect against basal cell carcinoma in humans.

8. Sunlight, Nutrition and Health Research Center (SUNARC) Organization is devoted to research and education relating to the prevention of chronic disease through changes in diet and lifestyle.

Scientific advisors to SUNARC:

Greg A. Plotnikoff, M.D.

Department of Internal Medicine

University of Minnesota Medical School

Minneapolis, Minn USA

George P. Studzinski, M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Pathology %26amp; Laboratory Medicine

UMD-New Jersey Medical School

185 South Orange Ave

Newark, NJ 07103 USA

John Jacob Cannell, MD

The Vitamin D Council

Atascadero, CA

Health Concerns and Facts about Sun Exposure

The increasing occurrence of skin cancer in the USA is a major concern of physicians. New research shows that the active ingredients (toxic chemicals) in some sunscreens may contribute to genetic damage and skin cancer (The Scientist, Mar/Apr. 1999: 7). In fact, the sunscreen chemicals can absorb the rays%26#039; energy, become energized, and chemically reactivate themselves, which can lead to chemical reaction in the skin that creates free radicals that cause DNA damage.

Toxic Ingredients to Avoid

Benzophenones (dixoybenzone, oxybenzone)

PABA and PABA esters (ethyl dihydroxy propyl PAB, glyceryl PABA,

p-aminobenzoic acid padimate O or Octyl dimethyl PABA)

Cinnamates (cinoxate, ethylhexyl, p-methoxycinnamate)

Salicylates (ethylhexyl salicylate, homosalate, octyl salicylate)

Avobenzone (butyl-methyoxydibenzoylmethane; Parsol 1789)

Digalloyl trioleate

Menthyl anthranilate

Propylene Glycol: Called a humectant in cosmetics, is industrial antifreeze, and the major ingredient in brake and hydraulic fluid. Material data sheets on Propylene Glycol warn to avoid skin contact as it is systemic and can cause liver abnormalities and kidney damage. If antifreeze is spilled on your garage floor and a dog or cat has one lick, it will kill them.

Chemical Composition of Sunscreens

Chemical sunscreens contain 2-5% chemical compounds. Benzophenone and similar compounds are some of the most powerful free radical generators known to man. They are used in industrial processes as free radicals to initiate chemical reactions. When activated by ultra violet light, the molecule doubles the bond to produce two free radical sites. The free radicals then initiate a chain reaction that can increase skin damage and increase skin cancer.

Worldwide the greatest risk in melanoma has been in countries where sunscreens have been heavily promoted. Queensland, Australia, where the medical establishment has vigorously promoted the use of sunscreens has more evidence of melanoma per capita than any other place. (Garland, Cedric F., et al. American Journal of Public Health, April 1992).

In 1997, Europe, Canada and Australia limited the formula for sunscreens to three specific ingredients: avobenzone, titanium dioxide and zinc oxide. All others were banned.

Best of health to you|||No, not true, regardless of sun exposure or vitamin D intake. People with basal or squamous cell skin cancers have a higher rate of second malignancies than people who have never had a non-melanoma skin cancer.

Cancer Causes Control. 2000 Dec;11(10):891-7.

Association of basal cell skin cancers with other cancers (United States).Friedman GD, Tekawa IS.

Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland, California, USA. gdf@leland.stanford.edu

BACKGROUND: Persons with basal cell skin cancer (BCSC) have shown increased risk of developing cancer at several other sites. METHODS: We identified 3164 persons with BCSC and 15,730 comparison subjects matched for age, sex, race, residence area and length of membership in a health maintenance organization. RESULTS: In retrospective follow-up for up to 24 years (mean 11.3 years), BCSC patients experienced statistically significant increases in the incidence of all cancer (relative risk [RR] = 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-1.4) lung cancer (RR = 1.4, CI = 1.0-1.8) and melanoma (RR = 2.2, CI = 1.6-3.0). Women experienced significantly increased risk for all cancer, lung cancer, melanoma and thyroid cancer, increases of borderline significance in breast cancer, non-Hodgkin%26#039;s lymphoma and leukemia, and increased pre-existing bladder cancer. Men showed statistically significant increases in all cancer, melanoma, and kidney cancers, and mouth and throat cancers. Multivariate analysis incorporating available risk factor data did not weaken positive associations with BCSC except slightly for melanoma and for bladder cancer in women. Other previously reported associations were not confirmed. CONCLUSION: Periodic skin examinations appear well justified after removal of BCSC to detect new skin cancers including melanoma. Given the relatively weak, unexplained associations of BCSC with internal cancers, the costs vs. benefits of extra efforts to detect the latter still need to be determined.

PMID: 11142523

Risk of subsequent cancer following invasive or in situ squamous cell skin cancer.Efird JT, Friedman GD, Habel L, Tekawa IS, Nelson LM.

Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5405, USA.

PURPOSE: Determine the risk of subsequent cancer following squamous cell skin cancer. METHODS: Using computerized surgical pathology records and membership data from a health maintenance organization, we retrospectively identified 822 individuals with primary squamous cell skin cancer (SCSC) and 3662 comparison subjects matched for age, sex, race, residence area, and length of membership. Patients were included in the study if they had no prior history of cancer, and received at least one multiphasic health checkup and questionnaire (MHC). Patients were followed for subsequent invasive cancer up to 24 years, with a mean follow-up time of 7.8 years. RESULTS: SCSC patients had a significantly greater risk [adjusted for body mass index (BMI) and education] for subsequent cancer overall (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) [risk ratio (RR) = 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-1.6], and for basal cell skin cancer (RR = 13.8, 95% CI = 8.8-21.9), digestive (RR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.1-2.4), and genitourinary cancers (RR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.0-2.0). An increased, but not statistically significant, adjusted risk (RR %26gt; or = 1.4) was also observed for lip, oral cavity, and pharynx cancer (RR = 3.9, 95% CI = 0.6-25.0); non-cutaneous squamous cell cancer (RR = 1.9, 95% CI = 0.9-4.4); and respiratory and intrathoracic cancer (RR = 1.4, 95% CI = 0.8-2.6). The addition of alcohol consumption, combined occupational exposure, marital status, and smoking history to the multivariate model did not materially change any significant positive associations with SCSC. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that patients diagnosed with SCSC may be at an increased risk of subsequent cancer at many sites, although several estimated risk estimates were within the limits of chance given no true association.

PMID: 12377424

Also, mercola.com is not an unbiased source of health information, hence the .com address. The info posted there is slanted towards alternative medicine.|||Hi health a(ngel),

That was a really fascinating and provocative question you asked. It prods me to get more sun exposure, especially with the recent info regarding Vitamin D, the sun%26#039;s vitamin, and how it helps to reduce cancer in various parts of the body.

Thank you for that.

Good luck and be well.

Kelley

Posted on March 1, 2008 in Prostate cancer by adminNo Comments »

After the finger in the but to check the prostate.and he said it felt lumpy. he had a psa test done which came back good not elevated at all. Thats all he is going to do.I read about having a lumpy prostate but it always talks about cancer. Is there anything else that can make a prostate gland lumpy and some what firm besides cancer.I would like to do a ultrasound but the doc dont think i need one .Now he is just a familly practitioner not a urologist. THANKS OZ|||Benign prostatic hypertrophy can make the prostate enlarged and lumpy. I think you need a second opinion, though, if for no other reason that to calm your nerves. Schedule an appointment with a proctologist.|||Second opinion! Go to a specialist, even if it is not anything and your doctor is right…you willing to risk it?|||Personally, I would go to a urologist and get a second opinion. It may NOT be cancer, but lets not take any chances here.

Posted on March 1, 2008 in Prostate cancer by adminNo Comments »

i need numbers for the worldwide cancer drug market by cancer type, i.e. breast, colon, prostate, lung, etc. does anybody know?|||There are different cancer treatment including surgery ,chemotherapy, radiation therapy, clinical trials, proton therapy, complementary medicine, and cutting edge technologies.

1-Biologic Therapy

The treatment which works by helping the immune system to function better by using substances that occur naturally in your body to fight cancer.

2-Bone Marrow Transplants

bone marrow, peripheral blood stem cell, and cord blood transplant patients.

3-Chemotherapy

chemotherapy treatment, drugs and side effects. Includes an overview of the treatment process and OncoLink Rx, a list of teaching sheets about chemotherapy drugs.

4-Clinical Trials

Tools to help empower cancer patients to evaluate research studies for which they may be eligible. Includes the OncoLink/EmergingMed Clinical Trials Matching Service, which encourages patients to seek out and consider clinical trials for the treatment of their cancer.

5-Complementary Medicine\the realm of complementary and alternative medicine with tips and warnings on treatments such as herbals, vitamins, chemicals, diet, meditation, massage, acupuncture, and body-mind therapy.

6-Gene Therapy

cutting edge therapy in an attempt to boost the immune system and improve the body%26#039;s natural ability to fight cancer.

7-Hormone Therapy

the various hormonal therapies used to treat many types of cancer.

8-PDT Center

photodynamic therapy (PDT) a novel cancer treatment which works by exposing a photosensitizing drug to specific wavelengths of light to kill cancer cells.

9-Proton Therapy

10-Radiation Oncology

radiation therapy and treatment side effects. Includes an overview of the treatment process.

11-Surgical Oncology

various surgical procedures used to treat many types of cancer.

12-Targeted Therapies

A cutting edge technology that deals with drugs which target specific pathways in the growth and development of tumors.

13-Vaccine Therapies

One of the more complex topics in cancer treatment and one of the most rapidly changing fields of cancer research.|||It was very hard for me to get the numbers, but I thought the link would help Report It
|||…………

Posted on March 1, 2008 in Prostate cancer by adminNo Comments »

Dr Johanna Budwig diet

Cancer, Arthritis, Multiple sclerosis, Psoriasis, Eczema, Acne, …

Flaxseed oil and cottage cheese

Six time nobel award nominated doctor says this essential nutrient combination actually prevents and cures cancer!

————————————–…

HOME - The Cancer Homepage

————————————–…

Read Flaxseed oil Testimonials :

http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/1158…

http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/1158…

————————————–…

Six time nobel award nominated doctor says this essential nutrient

combination actually prevents and helps body to cure cancer!

by Robert Willner, M.D.,Ph.D.

(author of %26quot;The Cancer Solution%26quot;).

————————————–…

Dr.Johanna Budwig Mix:

Put in your blender:

1 cup Organic cottage cheese (low fat, not too hard one, best make your own)(or yogurt)

2-5 Tbsp. of flaxseeed oil-

1-3 Tbsp. of freshly ground up flaxseed (coffee grinder ($15) works fine)

enough water to make it soft

little cayenne

optional:

little garlic

little red pepper

little champagne

Make it very soft.

Eat some of it every day.

(PS Adjust quantities for your taste !)

————————————–…

THE BUDWIG FLAX OIL DIET

The Flaxseed (Linseed) oil diet was originally proposed by Dr. Johanna Budwig, a german biochemist and expert on fats and oils, in 1951 and recently re-examined by Dr. Dan C. Roehm M.D. FACP (Oncologist and former cardiologist) in 1990. Dr. Roehm claims: %26quot;this diet is far and away the most successful anti-cancer diet in the world%26quot;.

Budwig claims that the diet is both a preventative and a curative. She says the absence of linol-acids [in the average western diet] is responsible for the production of oxydase, which induces cancer growth and is the cause of many other chronic disorders.

The beneficial oxydase ferments are destroyed by heating or boiling oils in foods, and by nitrates used for preserving meat, etc.

The theory is: the use of oxygen in the organism can be stimulated by protein compounds of sulphuric content, which make oils water-soluble and which is present in cheese, nuts, onion and leek vegetables such as leek, chive, onion and garlic, but especially cottage cheese.

Ferments of cell respiration closely connected with the highly unsaturated fatty acids, are also needed for proper oxydation. It is essential to use only unrefined, cold-pressed oils with high linolic acid content, such as linseed, sunflower, soya, poppyseed, walnut, and corn oils. Such oil should be consumed together with foods containing the right proteins otherwise the oils will have the OPPOSITE EFFECT, causing more harm than good.

The best combination is cottage cheese and linseed oil. The linseed should be freshly ground. Carbohydrates containing natural sugar, such as dates, figs, pears, apples and grapes, are also included in the diet. Honey is also beneficial. Most of the synthetic vitamin A preparations are bad because they contain oxidation products, but much carotine as provitamin A (from carrot) is consumed. Vitamin B from buttermilk, yoghurt, and natural yeast is beneficial.

A person requires daily about 4 oz. of cottage cheese mixed well with 1.5 oz. of linseed oil and 1 oz. of milk. A blender or egg beater works fine. The mixture an be sweeten with honey or otherwise flavoured naturally. Fresh fruits can be added. Every morning 2 spoonfuls of freshly ground linseed oil should be taken in luke warm buttermilk or yoghurt.

The diet is indicated for all kinds of chronic diseases, especially heart ailments (corony thrombosis), gall disorders, diabetes, arthritis, and malignancies. It improves failing hearing and sight. It is the ideal nutrient for children and infants. It is suggested that this diet be supplemented with lactic acid ferments (4).

%26quot;What she (Dr. Johanna Budwig) has demonstrated to my initial disbelief but lately, to my complete satisfaction in my practice is: CANCER IS EASILY CURABLE, the treatment is dietary/lifestyle, the response is immediate; the cancer cell is weak and vulnerable; the precise biochemical breakdown point was identified by her in 1951 and is specifically correctable, in vitro (test-tube) as well as in vivo (real)… %26quot; (Roehm, %26quot;Townsend Letter for Doctors%26quot;, July 1990)

GENERAL RULES

The patient has no nourishment on day ..1 other than 250 ml (8.5 oz) of Flax Oil with honey plus freshly squeezed fruit juices (no sugar added!). In the case of a very ill person, champagne may be added on the first day in place of juice and is taken with the Flax Oil and honey. Champagne is easily absorbable and has a serious purpose here.

1) SUGAR IS ABSOLUTELY FORBIDDEN. Grape juice may be added to sweeten any other freshly squeezed juices.

2) Other %26#039;forbiddens%26#039; are:

- All animal fats.

- All Salad Oils (this included commercial mayonnaise)

- All Meats (chemicals %26amp; hormones)

- Butter

- Margarine

- Preserved Meats (the preservatives block metabolism even of Flax Oil)

3) Freshly squeezed vegetable juices are fine - carrot, celery, apple, and red beet.

4) Three times daily a warm tea is essential - peppermint, rose hips or grape tea - all sweetened as desired with honey. One cup of black tea before noon is fine.

DAILY PLAN

Before breakfast - a glass of Acidophilus milk or Sauerkraut juice is taken.

Breakfast - Muesli (regular cereal) is overlaid with 2 tablespoons (30 ml) of Flax Oil and honey and fresh fruit according to season - berries, cherries, apricots, peaches, grated apple. Vary the flavour from day to day. Use any nuts except peanuts! Herbal teas as desired or black tea. A 4 oz (120 g) serving of THE SPREAD (directions below). This is fine to eat %26#039;straight%26#039; like a custard, or add it to other foods taken in the day as you will see.

Morning tea (10am) - A glass of fresh carrot juice, apple, celery, or beet-apple juice is taken.

Lunch - Raw salad with yoghurt-Flax Oil Mayonnaise (directions below).

In addition to %26#039;greens%26#039; salads, use grated turnips, carrots, kohlrabi, radishes, sauerkraut or cauliflower. A fine powder of horseradish, chives or parsley may be added for flavour.

Cooked Meal Course - Steamed vegetables, potatoes, or such grains as rice, buck-wheat or millet may be served. to these add either THE SPREAD or THE MAYO - for flavour and to up your intake of Flax Oil. Also mix THE SPREAD with potatoes for an especially hearty meal. Add caraway, chives, parsley or other herbs.

Dessert - Mix fresh fruit other than those used for breakfast with THE SPREAD, this time (instead of honey), flavoured using cream of lemon, vanilla or berries.

Afternoon Tea (4pm) - A small glass of natural wine (no preservatives) or champagne or fresh fruit juice with 1-2 tablespoons of honey-coated Fax Seeds.

Supper - Have this early, at 6pm. Make a hot meal using buckwheat, oat or soy cakes. grits from buckwheat are the very best and can be placed in a vegetable soup, or in a more solid form of cakes with herbal sauce. Sweet sauces %26amp; soups can always be given far more healing energy by adding THE SPREAD. Only honey or grape juice can be used for sweeteners. NO white sugar (or brown!) Only freshly squeezed juices and NOT reconstituted juices (preservative danger) may be used. These must be completely natural.

How to prepare %26#039;THE SPREAD%26#039;

Place 250 ml (8.5 oz) Flax Oil into a mixer bowl and add one pound (450 g) of 1 ottage Cheese (ie low fat eg Quark) and add 4 tablespoons (60 ml) of Honey. Turn on the mixer and add just enough low fat milk or water to get the contents of the bowl to blend in together. In 5 minutes, a preparation of custard consistency results that has NO taste of the oil (and no oily %26#039;ring%26#039; should be seen when you rinse out the bowl).

Alternatively, you can use Yoghurt instead of Cottage Cheese in proportions of 1 oz (30 g) of Yoghurt to 1 tablespoon (15 ml) each of Flax Oil and of honey and blend as above.

NOTE: When Flax Oil is blended like this, it does not cause diarrhoea even when given in large amounts. It reacts chemically with the (sulphur) proteins of the cottage cheese, yoghurt, etc.

How to prepare %26#039;THE MAYO%26#039; (Mayonnaise):

Mix together 2 tablespoons (30 ml) Flax Oil, 2 tablespoons (30 ml) milk, and 2 tablespoons (30 ml) Yoghurt.

Then add 2 tablespoons (30 ml) of Lemon juice (or Apple Cider Vinegar) and add 1 teaspoon (2.5g) Mustard plus some herbs such as marjoram or dill.

Next add 2 or 3 slices of health food store pickles (no preservatives! - read label!) and a pinch of herbal salts.

(The above mayonnaise plus lots of mustard and a few bananas is very tasty!)

Concluding remarks by Dr. Roehm - %26quot;I only wish that all my patients had a PhD in Biochemistry and Quantum Physics to enable them to see how with such consummate skill this diet was put together. It is a wonder. The champagne vehicle IS easier to assimilate and get someone almost on their death-bed going again. A retention enema of 250 ml (8.5 oz) of oil is another route to get this precious life-furthering, ELECTRON-RICH oil into the body. It can also be applied to the skin for transdermal

absorption. I%26#039;ll answer your questions and give you %26quot;special orders%26quot; for you particular case.

You will have to remain on this diet for a good 5 years, at which time your tumour may have disappeared. Persons who break the rules of this diet, Dr Budwig reports, (ie eating preserved meats, candy, etc) will sometimes grow rapidly worse and cannot be saved after they come back from their spree (bon-bons mean bye-bye).

In 1967, Dr Budwig broadcast the following sentence during an interview over the South German Radio Network, describing her incoming patients with failed operations and x-ray therapy%26quot;:

%26quot;Even in these cases it is possible to restore health in a few months at most, I would truly say 90f the time%26quot;.

%26quot;This has never been contradicted, but this knowledge has been a long time reaching this side of the ocean, hasn%26#039;t it? Cancer treatment can be very simple and very successful once you know how. The cancer interests dont want you to know this.

May those of you who have suffered from this disease (and I include your family and friends in this) forgive the miscreants who have kept this simple information from reaching you for so long%26quot;.

(signed) Dan C. Roehm, M.D. FACP

————————————–…

%26quot;The best, purest, most carefully prepared Flax Oil in America is, in my opinion%26quot;, said Roehm, %26quot;is Omegaflo. Arrowhead mills label is most often seen in Florida (USA). Look for the Omegaflo%26quot;.

%26quot;FLAX (LINSEED) OIL is readily denatured by oxygen, heat, and light. That%26#039;s why it is used in paint. Rancid oil is bad for health, so oil MUST be carefully produced, packed under nitrogen in light-proof

containers, refrigerated until used, used as fresh as possible, and stabilised with protein (THE SPREAD, etc) promptly once the container is opened…%26quot;

Flax Seeds may also be used. Seeds need only be cracked in a food blender, or they may be ground in a coffee grinder. One needs three times the amount of seed to get the oil equivalent. Seeds are high in calories, so one may gain weight. The seeds are also high in soluble fibre, so blending with liquid tends to produce ever-hardening %26quot;jellies%26quot;. Fresh-cracked seed sprinkled on muesli %26amp; eaten promptly

tastes great.

——-

Ed McCabe (p85, %26quot;Oxygen Therapies%26quot;) discusses his point of view on

essential fatty acids:

%26quot;The red blood cells in the lungs give up carbon dioxide and take on oxygen. They are then transported to the cell site via the blood vessels, where, they release their oxygen into the plasma. This released oxygen is %26quot;attracted%26quot; to the cells by the %26quot;resonance%26quot; of the pi-electron%26quot; oxidation-enhancing fatty acids. Otherwise, oxygen cannot work its way into the cell. %26quot;Electron rich fatty acids%26quot; play the decisive role in %26quot;respiratory enzymes, which are the basis of cell oxidation…%26quot;.

%26quot;Dont eat anything hydrogenated like (like margarine, or fried foods) as it defeats oxygenation. Avoid products that say %26quot;hydrogenated%26quot;.

%26quot;We should eat essential polyunsaturated fatty acids to enhance oxygenation. They can be found naturally in Carotene, Saffron, and Flaxseed oil.%26quot;

REFERENCES

1. %26quot;Promotion and Prevention of Tumour Growth Effects of Endotoxin, Inflamation, and Dietary Lipids%26quot;, by Raymond Kearney, Ph.D, Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Sydney, Sydney, N.S.W. 2006 Australia. International Clinical Nutrition Review, October, 1987 Vol.

7, No. 4.

2. Roehm, %26quot;Townsend Letter for Doctors%26quot;, July 1990

3. Ed McCabe, %26quot;Oxygen Therapies%26quot;

4. %26quot;The natural way to better health and longer life%26quot;, Bullivant.

5. Arlin J. Brown, %26quot;March of Truth On Cancer%26quot;, (seventh edition). Summary of 79 nontoxic cancer treatments. Available from the Arlin J. Brown Information Centre Inc., P.O. Box 251, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 22060. Ph: 1-703-752-9511.

————————————–…

Who is Dr. Johanna Budwig?

Dr. Johanna Budwig is known and highly respected around the world as Germany%26#039;s premier biochemist. In addition, Dr. Budwig holds a Ph.D. in Natural Science, has undergone medical training, and was schooled in pharmaceutical science, physics, botany and biology. In all courses, this brilliant scientist excelled.

She is best known for her extensive research on the properties and benefits of flaxseed oil combined with sulphurated proteins in the diet, and over the years has published a number of books on the subject, including %26quot;Cancer–A Fat Problem,%26quot; %26quot;The Death of the Tumor,%26quot; and %26quot;True Health Against Arteriosclerosis, Heart Infarction %26amp; Cancer.%26quot;

Dr. Budwig has assisted many seriously ill individuals, even those given up as terminal by orthodox medical practitioners, to regain their health through a simple regimen of nutrition. The basis of Dr. Budwig%26#039;s program is the use of flaxseed oil blended with low-fat cottage cheese.

In the mid 1950%26#039;s, Dr. Budwig began her long and meticulous research on the importance of essential fatty acids (linoleic and linolenic) in the diet. Her subsequent discoveries and announcements sparked mixed reactions. While the general public was eager for this astounding information, German manufacturers of commercial dietary fats (margarine, hard shortening, vegetable oils) went to extremes to prevent her from publishing her findings. Fortunately, while Dr. Budwig%26#039;s vital announcements were initially met with resistance backed by those with financial stakes in the commercial fats industry, her persistence paid off. Today, Dr. Johanna Budwig is world renowned for her important discoveries on the benefits of flaxseed oil. Her fame precedes her as she lectures all over Europe.

Fats-Good and Bad

Dr. Johanna preaches against the use of what she calls %26quot;pseudo%26quot; fats. In order to extend the shelf life of their products, manufacturers use chemical processes that render their food products harmful to the body. These harmful fats go by a number of names, including %26quot;hydrogenated,%26quot; %26quot;partially hydrogenated%26quot; and even %26quot;polyunsaturated.%26quot;

The chemical processing of fats destroys the vital electron cloud within the fat. Once the electrons have been removed, these fats can no longer bind with oxygen, and they actually become a harmful substance deposited within the body. The heart, for instance, rejects these fats and they end up as inorganic fatty deposits on the heart muscle itself.

Chemically processed fats are not water-soluble when bound to protein. They end up blocking circulation, damage heart action, inhibit cell renewal and impede the free flow of blood and lymph fluids. The bio-electrical action in these areas slows down and may become completely paralyzed. The entire organism shows a measurable loss of electrical energy which is replenished only by adding active lipids to the diet. These nutritional fats are truly vital for man and beast alike.

Science has proven that fats play an important role in the functioning of the entire body. Fats (lipids) are vital for all growth processing, renewal of cells, brain and nerve functions, even for the sensory organs (eyes and ears), and for the body%26#039;s adjustment to heat, cold and quick temperature changes. Our energy resources are based on lipid metabolism. To function efficiently, cells require true polyunsaturated, live electron-rich lipids, present in abundance in raw flaxseed oil. True polyunsaturated fats greedily absorb proteins and oxygen and pump them through the system.

Lipids are only water-soluble and free-flowing when bound to protein; thus the importance of protein-rich cottage cheese. When high quality, electron-rich fats are combined with proteins, the electrons are protected until the body requires energy. This energy source is then fully and immediately available to the body on demand, as nature intended.

Proven Benefits Still Pouring In

Since Dr. Johanna Budwig%26#039;s findings on the benefits of flaxseed oil have been widely publicized, scientists around the world have eagerly jumped on the bandwagon. Studies conducted using flaxseed oil on numerous disorders have been pouring in from all over the world, showing impressive results, including anti-tumor activity, increased metabolism, greatly boosted immune system, reduced cholesterol levels, normalized blood pressure levels and inhibition of cancer cell growth. Books research reports, articles and testimonials abound, all touting the healthy benefits achieved by supplementing the diet with organic, raw, cold-pressed flaxseed oil with low-fat cottage cheese. Dr. Budwig%26#039;s research was based on using the ratio of 2 tablespoons flaxseed oil mixed with one-quarter cup of low fat cottage cheese.

Backed with all this extensive research, the indisputable fact is: Supplementing your diet daily with flaxseed oil combined with sulphurated proteins could very well be the most important thing you do for yourself every day.

————————————–…

A top European cancer research scientist, Dr Johanna Budwig, has

discovered a totally natural formula that not only protects against the

development of cancer but people all over the world who have been diagnosed

with incurable cancer and sent home to die have actually been cured and now

lead normal healthy lives.

After three decades of research Dr. Budwig, sixtime nominee for the Nobel

Award, found that the blood of seriously ill cancer patients was always,

without exception, deficient in certain important essential ingredients

which included substances called phosphatides and lipoproteins. (The blood

of a healthy person always contains sufficient quantities of these essential

ingredients. However, without these natural ingredients cancer cells grow

wild and out of control.)

Blood analysis showed a strange greenish-yellow substance in place of the

healthy red oxygen carrying hemoglobin that belongs there. This explained

why cancer patients weaken and become anemic This startling discovery led

Dr. Budwig to test her theory.

She found that when these natural ingredients where replaced over

approximately a three month period, tumors gradually receded. The strange

greenish elements in the blood were replaced with healthy red blood cells as

the phosphatides and lipoproteins almost miraculously reappeared. Weakness

and anemia disappeared and life energy was restored. Symptoms of cancer,

liver dysfunction and diabetes were completely alleviated.

Dr. Budwig then discovered an all natural way for people to replace those

essential ingredients their bodies so desperately needed in their daily

diet. By simply eating a combination of just two natural and delicious

foods not only can cancer be prevented but in case after case it was

actually cured. (These two natural foods, organic flax seed oil %26amp; cottage

cheese) must be eaten together to be effective since one triggers the

properties of the other to be released.)

After more than 10 years of solid clinical application, Dr. Budwig%26#039;s natural

formula has proven successful where many orthodox remedies have failed. Dr.

Budwig%26#039;s formula has been used therapeutically in Europe for prevention of:

Cancer! Arteriosclerosis, Strokes, Cardiac Infarction, Heartbeat

(irregular), Liver (fatty degeneration), Lungs (reduces bronchial

spasms), Intestines (regulates activity). Stomach Ulcers (normalizes

gastric juices), Prostate (hypertopic), Arthritis (exerts a favorable

influence), Eczema (assists all skin diseases), Old age (improves many

common afflictions), Brain (strenghthens activity), Immune Deficiency

Syndromes (multiple sclerosis, autoimmune illnesses)

Thousands have flocked to hear Dr. Budwig lecture all over Europe. The many

people Dr. Budwig%26#039;s formula has helped testify to the benefits of her

remarkable discovery. Following are a few examples: In one of my interviews

with Dr. Budwig I was introduced to Siegried Ernst, M.D.. He is a rare and

dedicated man who counts among his personal friends the current Pope as well

as many other dignitaries.

————————————–…

Testimonials :

Dr. Ernst

Seventeen years ago Dr. Ernst had developed cancer for which he had

major surgery requiring removal of his stomach. Two years later he had a

recurrence of the cancer and was offered chemotherapy as the only available

remedy. There was little hope for survival as virtually all individuals with

recurrence of this type of cancer rarely last a year.

Dr. Ernst knew that chemotherapy was not only ineffective for his type of

cancer but completaly destructive of the quality of life, so he refused.

He turned to Dr. Budwig and her formula for help. He religiously followed

Dr. Budwig%26#039;s formula and fifteen years later has not had any recurrence of

cancer. As a matter of fact he seemed to me to be in perfect health and is

tireless for a man in his late seventies.

————————————–…

Maria W.

Maria W. tells her story in her own words: %26quot;I was told by the most expert of

doctors that I would have to be operated on to cut out the cancerous tumor

that was causing a swelling under my eye. They explained that the size of

the tumor was much greater inside and that there was very serious bone

involvement. The malignancy was too far advanced to respond to radiation

treatment. The doctors planned to remove considerable facial tissue and

bone. I was afraid for my life, but being a young woman, couldn%26#039;t bear the

thought of such disfigurement.

When I heard about Dr. Budwig%26#039;s natural formula, I was skeptical but

desperate for help. After four months on this regimen, the swelling under my

left eye completely disappeared. The doctors at the University hospital gave

me many exhausting tests. One told me, %26#039;If I didn%26#039;t have your previous

x-rays and medical history in front of me, I wouldn%26#039;t believe that you ever

had cancer. There is hardly any indication of a tumor remaining.%26#039; I never

thought using Dr, Budwig%26#039;s formula would be so successful. My whole family

and I are very grateful.%26quot;

————————————–…

Sandy A.

An examination of Sandy A. revealed arachnoidal bleeding due to an

inoperable brain tumor. The doctors informed Sandy that he was beyond

medical help. At his expressed wish, Sandy was discharged from the

hospital and sent home to die in peace.

A friend brought Dr. Budwigs formula to Sandys attention. Sandy writes.

Since I went on the Budwig regimen, the paralysis is of my eyes, arms, and

legs has receded daily. After only a short period of time, I was able to

urinate normally. My health improved so rapidly that I was soon able to

return to my work part-time. Shortly after that, I was again examined at the

Research Center and my reflexes were completely normal. The Budwig diet

saved my life! Ten years later, I was given a thorough examination at the

Center as a follow-up. My incredible recovery has been written up In many

medical journals and I have become what they call a %26#039;textbook case,%26#039; and

all because of Dr. Johanna Budwig%26#039;s simple diet.%26quot;

————————————–…

Timmy G.

Seven years ago Timmy G. was diagnosed as having Hodgkins disease. The child

was operated on and underwent 24 radiation treatments, plus additional

experimental therapies that the experts hoped would be of some small help.

When Timmy failed to respond favorably to these heroic measures, he was

discharged as incurable, and given six months to live and sent home to die.

The desperate parents contacted specialists all over the world. A famous

newspaper took up Timmy%26#039;s cause and ran editorials pleading for someone to

come forth who could offer hope for the life of a child. All the specialists

who replied confirmed the cruel prognosis: There was no hope or help for

Timmy.

At this dark hour the miracle the family had prayed for happened!

Timmy%26#039;s mother told her story to the press: %26quot;A friend sent me a printed piece about one of Dr. Budwig%26#039;s speeches. This material gave us hope and I contacted Dr. Budwig.

In just five days, (on the Budwig regimen) Timmy%26#039;s breathing became normal

for the first lime In almost two years.

From this day on, Timmy began to feel good again. He went back to school, started swimming and by winter he was doing craft work. Everyone who knows him says how well he looks.%26quot; At age 18 Timmy is showing great promise in his university work. He knows he owes his life to Dr. Budwig and thanks her daily in his prayers.

One of the two foods in on Budwig%26#039;s formula, cottage cheese, is available

in nearly every grocery store in America. The other, pure organic linseed

oil, however comes primarily from Europe and can only be found in certain

health food stores throughout the United States.

By simply mixing these two delicious foods together and eating them you will

be providing yourself and your family with the optimal preventive

nutritional protection against cancer and other disease.

————————————–…

Today, fresh expeller pressed flaxseed oil is available in most countries in the world, including USA and Europe.

Books to read:

%26quot;Flax Oil As a True Aid Against Arthritis Heart Infarction Cancer and Other Diseases%26quot;

by Johanna Dr. Budwig

Amazon Price: $5.56

Read more about this title…

%26quot;The Breuss Cancer Cure%26quot; : Advice for the Prevention and Natural Treatment of Cancer, Leukemia and Other Seemingly Incurable Diseases

by Rudolf Breuss Amazon Price : $11.00

%26quot;A Cancer Therapy%26quot; : Results of Fifty Cases and the Cure of Advanced Cancer by Diet Therapy : A Summary of 30 Years of Clinical Experimentation

by M. Max Gerson Amazon Price: $24.95

Read more about this title…

Flax Oil by Dr Budwig

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0…

http://www.oxytherapy.com/mail-archive/o…

Flax Oil and Cancer -A Tape Transcription by Clifford Beckwith

http://www.public.usit.net/spinner/Flax1…

Links to Other Flaxseed Oil %26amp; Health Sites

http://www.public.usit.net/spinner/Flaxl…

Dr. Budwig and The Healing Power of Flaxseed (Commercial site)

http://www.barleans.com/budwig.html

Essential Fatty Acids for Kids Superimmunity

http://www.healthychild.com/efa.htm

Flaxseed and the Immune System @ http://www.flaxcouncil.ca/flaxnut16.htm

The Importance of Omega-3 Fatty Acids for Adults and Children

http://www.flaxcouncil.ca/flaxnut11.htm

Essential Fatty Acids: Are You Deficient In These Key Nutrients?

http://www.barleans.com/deficient.html

Other Pages On This Site About Cancer:

What Doctors say about Chemo Therapy here

What Doctors say about Radiation Therapy here

What doctors say about Breast cancer ? here

Cancer cause : Dental Risk ? here

Govallo http://home.earthlink.net/~emptherapies/…

Burzynski http://catalog.com/bri/bri.htm

Cancer %26amp; Nutrition Articles

http://drcranton.com/nutrition.htm Nutrition In The News

Diet

Gerson

http://www.gerson.com/history.html

http://www.1999.com/gerson/

http://www.gerson.com/cnb104.html

http://gerson.org/booklist.html..acancer…

Gerson Institute http://www.gerson.org/index.html

**************************************…

Tibetan Buddhist Monks - Sacred Healing Chant

EFAs, Oxygenation and Cancer Prevention

Cancer as well as heart disease can be prevented by taking a ratio of at least 1:1 up to 2.5:1 unadulterated parent omega-6 to

omega-3 essential fatty acids plus specific vitamins and minerals.

————————————–…

Extracted from Nexus Magazine, Volume 14, Number 1 (December 2006 - January 2007)

PO Box 30, Mapleton Qld 4560 Australia. editor@nexusmagazine.com

Telephone: +61 (0)7 5442 9280; Fax: +61 (0)7 5442 9381

From our web page at: www.nexusmagazine.com

© 2006 by Prof. Brian Scott Peskin, BSEE (MIT)1

Website: http://www.BrianPeskin.com

Based on his book, co-written with

Amid Habib, MD, FAAP, FACE,

The Hidden Story of Cancer

(Pinnacle Press, Houston, USA, 2006)

————————————–…

The prime cause of cancer is not genetic

Cancer was once an uncommon disease affecting a small percentage of Americans. In 1900, only 3% of the population died of cancer.2 But now, cancer has become so common that virtually everyone knows someone afflicted with this terrible disease. In fact, for the average American, contraction of cancer isn%26#039;t the exception; instead, it has become the rule.3 We%26#039;ve come to accept cancer as unstoppable, incurable and even a natural part of life. This perception is a tragedy, since cancer is not a natural disease for man and is preventable.

What is shocking to most people, is the scientific fact that cancer is genetically recessive, not dominant. In fact, the human body is highly resistant to cancer. In 1969, Professor Henry Harris of Oxford University shook the cancer research community to its core when he proved these previous theories wrong. Professor Harris took normal tissue cells and fused three types of cancer cells to them. Surely, he thought, the cancer cells would take over the normal cells and %26quot;convert%26quot; them into cancer. Surprisingly, they grew normally.4

Contrary to popular opinion, cancer takes several decades to develop in humans.5 Given this long incubation period, science can show us the way to destroy any initial pre-cancerous cells and keep the cancerous ones from causing widespread damage.

If you think cancer has a genetic basis, then think again. Dr Robert A. Weinberg of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), one of the world%26#039;s leading cancer researchers and discoverer of the so-called oncogene (cancer-causing gene), reversed his previous conclusions after discovering that %26quot;fewer than one DNA base in a million appears to have been miscopied%26quot;. It%26#039;s not enough of a defect! His exact words: %26quot;Something was very wrong. The notion that a cancer developed through the successive activation of a series of oncogenes had lost its link to reality.%26quot; He called the genetic discoveries made thus far %26quot;sterile%26quot;.6 The prime cause of cancer is therefore not genetic. This was announced in 1998. Did you hear about it? Probably not.

In 2006, the heads of the world%26#039;s largest cancer research centre in Houston, Texas, announced that cancer%26#039;s prime cause isn%26#039;t genetic: %26quot;%26#039;If it could have happened [solving cancer with genetics], it would have already happened with genetic mutations,%26#039; said William Brinkley, a senior vice-president at Baylor who says other research should take precedence over the cancer genome projectÉ Dr John Mendelsohn [president of M. D. Anderson Cancer Center] states, %26#039;Any claims that this [genetic research] is going to be the key to curing cancer are not appropriate.%26#039;%26quot;7

Thus, the prime cause of cancer is not a genetic mutation. Even if cancer %26quot;runs in your family%26quot;, there is real hope. Unfortunately, the geneticists have it backwards, attempting to force the facts to fit their genetics-based theories when they don%26#039;t fit the facts, because, as Professor Harris demonstrated many years ago, cancer isn%26#039;t genetically dominant. Where does this leave us? Where can we look for solutions? What about the popular nutritional solutions to fighting cancer?

The popular anti-cancer %26quot;solutions%26quot; don%26#039;t work

Most people diligently follow the experts%26#039; recommendations in the hope of winning the war on cancer. Unfortunately, virtually nothing of what we are told is based on scientific facts. Consider the following list of supposed %26quot;solutions%26quot;, along with the date of their published failures as reported in the world%26#039;s leading medical journals. Many of us never hear of the retractions and consequently keep following methods that don%26#039;t protect us from contracting cancer.

(a) Fruits and vegetables: Even the green leafy vegetables don%26#039;t protect against contracting breast cancer (JAMA 2001; 285:769-776).8

(b) Fibre: This worsens colon cancer rather than helping prevent it (Lancet 2000; 356:1286-7).9

(c) Mammography: Samuel S. Epstein, MD (chairman of the Cancer Prevention Coalition), Rosalie Bertell and Barbara Seaman published an article exposing truths about mammography that most women have never been told (Int J Health Sci 2001; 31(3):605-15): %26quot;Contrary to popular belief and assurances by the US media…mammography is not a technique for early diagnosis. In fact, a breast cancer has usually been present for about eight (8) years before it can finally be detected…%26quot;10

(d) Fish oil: Most fish oil supplements are worthless in preventing cancer and may be hazardous to your health (articles: 1995Ð2006). The International Society for the Study of Fatty Acids and Lipids (ISSFAL) 4th Congress, which met on 4Ð9 June 2000 in Tsukuba, Japan, reported the following:11

%26quot;…[S]tudies indicate that at the levels used, fish oil [comprised of omega-3 derivatives] decreases a wide range of immune cell responses (natural killer cell, cytotoxic T lymphocyte activities, lymphocyte proliferation and production of IL-2 and IFN-y (1,2))…%26quot;

%26quot;…Recent studies have indicated that relatively low levels of the long chain omega-3 fatty acids (EPA or DHA)…are sufficient to bring about some of the suppressive effects…%26quot;

%26quot;…This decrease (of inhibited lymphocyte proliferation and natural killer cell activity) causes increased cellular bacteria [infection] and impaired tumor cell killing.%26quot;

Any substance causing impaired tumour cell killing ability is cancer-causingÑthe opposite of what we desire. With so many of us consuming fish oil, could this be another reason that cancer contraction rates are increasing instead of decreasing?

Fish oil is also worthless in preventing heart disease, and Harvard Medical School warned us about this years ago but too few Americans listened.12 Consuming whole fish instead of fish oil failed, too.13

The Japanese have greater cancer rates and greater heart disease rates than Americans. Cancer has been Japan%26#039;s number-one cause of death since 1981.14 The popular media don%26#039;t often disclose these startling facts.

In January 2006, the omega-3 anti-cancer fallacy was exposed (JAMA 2006; 295(4)): %26quot;A large body of literature spanning numerous cohorts from many countries and with different demographic characteristics does not provide evidence to suggest a significant association between omega-3 fatty acids and [lack of] cancer incidence. Dietary supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids [is] unlikely to prevent cancer.%26quot;15

The most comprehensive analysis to date, published in the British Medical Journal of 24 March 2006, reviewing 96 trials including 44 trials with supplements and five trials consisting of mainly ALA (parent omega-3) from plants like flax with the remainder being fish oil, confirms the anti-cancer failure: %26quot;We found no evidence that omega-3 fats had an effect on the incidence of cancer and there was no inconsistency… This systematic review assessed the health effects of using omega-3 fats (together or separately) on total mortality, cardiovascular events, cancer and strokes in a wide variety of participants and found no evidence of a clear benefit of omega-3 fats on health.%26quot;16

Unfortunately, in spite of these facts, most physicians around the world still recommend fish oil to prevent both cancer and heart disease.

(e) Soy: Soy products won%26#039;t protect you against contracting cancer, either. The properties of soy are still touted by nutritionists, physicians and popular health and beauty publications, all ignorant of the scientific facts. There is a very hazardous side to soy that you need to know about. For example, the article %26quot;Soybean Goiter: Report of Three Cases%26quot; (NEJM 1960; 262(22):1099-1103) details three cases of infants developing goitre when they were consuming soybean %26quot;formula%26quot;. The condition was rapidly eliminated in two of the infants when the soy %26quot;formula%26quot; was terminated. The third child was cured when iodine was added to the diet.17

What did soy formula have to do with thyroid (goitre) problems? Soybeans are a source of isoflavonoids, including genistein and daidzein. Contrary to popular belief and what is often reported in the media, they are both hazardous to your health. The following comes from Biochemical Pharmacology 1997; 54:1087-96): %26quot;Soybeans contain compounds (genistein and daidzein-the %26#039;active ingredients%26#039;) that inhibit [interfere with] thyroid peroxidase (TPO) which is essential to thyroid hormone synthesis [production].%26quot; Soybeans are not good for the thyroid! The popular so-called phyto-oestrogens genistein and daidzein are actually endocrine disruptors. Women around the world have been misled. What does soy %26quot;formula%26quot; have to do with the iodine deficiency? Soy contains phytates which %26quot;magnetise out%26quot; essential nutrients like iodine.

Today, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Department of Health and Human Services, lists 288 records of soy at its %26quot;FDA Poisonous Plant Database%26quot; (March 2006 revision). Their website will shock you as you discover that soy is anything but a health food (http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~djw/pltx.cgi?Q…

Soy harms your immune system, too. Back in 1975, the Canadian Journal of Biochemistry reported that soybeans actually weaken your immune system:21 %26quot;Soybean trypsin inhibitor was found to inhibit transformation of human lymphocytes…%26quot;

Here%26#039;s why this happens. Trypsin is an enzyme produced by your pancreas and used in digesting protein; it is critical for antibody production. An inhibitor is something that disables. Think of it like having one foot on the gas and another on the brake of your automobile at the same time. Your car%26#039;s engine would blow up.

So a trypsin inhibitor will irritate your pancreas, stressing it to produce hormones when it can%26#039;t, leading to decreased oxygenation from the irritation. Soy prevents the protein you eat from being fully utilised and digested. Your immune system can%26#039;t get fuelled with proper antibodies and lymphocytes–a double whammy. Therefore, soy is cancer-causing to your pancreas, and cancer of the pancreas is typically a death sentence. Because of bad advice, many women especially have decreased the amount of cancer-fighting animal-based protein they consume in favour of soy. Resist this incorrect advice and minimise your chances of contracting both thyroid and pancreatic cancer.

Dr Otto Warburg%26#039;s anti-cancer research

Many of my physician colleagues were shocked to discover these truths. How many of us saw these important medical journal findings reported in the popular press? Unfortunately, not enough of us. Don%26#039;t despair, because there is an anti-cancer answer. It was discovered back in 1925 by Otto Warburg, MD, PhD. Dr Warburg has been referred to as the greatest biochemist of the 20th century; the sheer number and magnitude of his discoveries qualify him as the most accomplished biochemist of all time.22

In the 1920s, Dr Warburg carried on the research on respiratory enzymes, certain vitamins and minerals that the body requires for the utilisation of oxygen in the cells, which eventually earned him the Nobel Prize in 1931. (Today, these vitamins and minerals are termed %26quot;co-enzymes%26quot;.) The Nobel Committee clearly expected the medical world to benefit through Otto Warburg%26#039;s vital discoveries about cancer. Unfortunately, politics intervened and cancer wasn%26#039;t eradicated.

Despite his early successes and honours, Dr Warburg continued to make major fundamental discoveries throughout his later years as well, capping off an amazingly fruitful 60-year career in research. In addition, Dr Warburg often created new tools for his research. For example, he discovered how to measure the pressure of oxygen in a living cell by developing a special manometerÑa very important development that led to his discovery that low oxygen concentration and pressure always presaged the development of cancer.

The importance of Dr Warburg%26#039;s achievement is that he isolated the functional prime cause of cancer. Rather than working on a theoretical level too far removed from the physiological realities of cancer to be able to provide practical therapies and preventive programs, he described the actual conditions in the cells that set up and cause cancer, and by doing this made it possible for others later to develop functional, practical ways to inhibit the development of cancer.

It is appalling that no significant principle out of his numerous discoveries has been utilised by the US medical research community for cancer prevention, treatment and remission retention. Despite the expression of opinions disputing the direction and validity of Warburg%26#039;s work, no scientist or researcher has ever disproved the validity, correctness or applicability of these important discoveries to the prevention and cure of cancer. Even today, medical consensus often has little to do with science. Politics has squandered the efforts of many cancer researchers.

The prime cause of cancer

We have become so accustomed to being told that %26quot;some day%26quot; we might discover what causes cancer and that cancer is the major medical mystery of our modern time, that the following might be hard to believe.

Dr Otto Warburg discovered and clearly stated that the prime, most basic, cause of cancer is too little oxygen getting into the cell. %26quot;We find by experiment about 35% inhibition of oxygen respiration already suffices to bring about such a transformation during cell growth,%26quot; he stated at a 1966 conference of Nobel laureates in Lindau, Germany.28

That%26#039;s it! It sounds very simple, doesn%26#039;t it? Just one-third less oxygen than normal and you contract cancer. Based on meticulous experiments that he and many others verified numerous times, Dr Warburg discovered and stated that the prime, number-one cause of cancer is simply too little oxygen getting into the cell (hypoxia).

It gets worse because once a cell becomes cancerous, it can%26#039;t return to normal; it must be destroyed (Science 1956; 123(3191)).29

When I first encountered this information, I didn%26#039;t believe it. Even now, there is still no one who is more shocked than I am! To my amazement, this cancer-oxygen connection information has been published numerous times in recent cancer journals, e.g., Radiotherapy and Oncology 1993; 26(1):45-50 and 1999; 53:113-17.30 However, the practical solution to solving the oxygen deficiency problem has evaded researchersÑprobably because they haven%26#039;t known where to start.

Taking hydrogen peroxide, calcium supplements, fish oil supplements, massive amounts of omega-3, ozone or so-called %26quot;oxygenated water%26quot; won%26#039;t solve the cellular oxygen deficiency. No one has been able to advance Dr Warburg%26#039;s discovery until now.

This lack of understanding explains many of the misunderstood biochemical activities related to cancer that waste precious time and lead virtually nowhere. Only Dr Warburg%26#039;s anti-cancer discovery predicts so many never-before-explained real-life results.31

Dr Warburg%26#039;s discovery has been verified numerous times both in turning normal cells cancerous and in showing that cancer doesn%26#039;t develop in highly oxygenated areas. Surprisingly, it was American physicians who conclusively proved it in 1953 and confirmed it in 1955! Goldblatt and Cameron noted (p. 535) (J. Experimental Medicine 1953; 97:535-552) that once damage is too great to the cell, then no amount of oxygen will return the cell%26#039;s respiration back to normal: it is forever doomed to a cancerous life.

This is why prevention is the ultimate solution to never contracting cancer. However, they confirmed it is possible to prevent a %26quot;respiration-impacted%26quot; precancerous cell from becoming permanently cancerous if oxygen deficiency is stopped early enough.32

Secondary causes of cancer

Virtually every supposed cause of cancer mentioned today in the health and nutritional media is a secondary cause. Secondary causes include things such as environment, chemical carcinogens, environmental and medical radiation, trans-fats, food additives, the chemicals in tobacco smoke, viruses and even genetic mutations.

There are innumerable secondary causes of cancer, and minimising them and their harmful effects can be helpful in preventing cancer. But endlessly pursuing new secondary causes, like smoking, without explaining specifically what common effect they have on the cells, has never led, and will never lead, researchers to a real cancer cure.

Dr Warburg cautioned us again and again about wasting precious time pursuing secondary causes. Make no mistake about this: the thing every secondary cause of cancer has in common with every other one is that it leads, directly or indirectly, to insufficient oxygen in the cells. Therefore, if we directly address the question of how to get sufficient oxygen into the cells, we will have minimised the danger from every type of secondary cause.

Exercise is not the solution to remaining cancer-free

I know what many of you are likely thinking: %26quot;I exercise a lot, therefore I am oxygenating my blood. I%26#039;ve got cancer beat!%26quot; No. All that exercise didn%26#039;t stop world champion cyclist Lance Armstrong from contracting cancer. It is true that by exercising you are increasing oxygenation to your blood. However, by doing so, you still haven%26#039;t guaranteed that this oxygen will be transferred effectively to each cell in each organ in your body.

Dr Warburg made it quite clear that oxygen alone is not sufficient: %26quot;To be sure, cancer development takes place even in the presence of free oxygen gas in the atmosphere, but this oxygen may not penetrate in sufficient quantity into the growing body cells, or the respiratory apoenzymes of the growing body cells may not be saturated with the active groups.%26quot;34

There are many factors that promote the lack of cellular oxygen, including certain deficiencies we will talk about shortly. Exercise, by itself, is therefore not the solution to remaining cancer free. Many people, including athletes, who exercise regularly still get cancer. Furthermore, a person breathes at least 17,000 times a day (12 breaths a minute). Do you really think that you aren%26#039;t breathing in enough oxygen with 17,000 breaths a day? You are. The problem lies elsewhere.

Essential fatty acids and EFA-containing oils

The body requires special fats that, among other important functions, make it possible for sufficient oxygen to reach the cells via the cellular membranes, which are the key. These special fats are highly oxygen-absorbing. Called essential fatty acids, or EFAs, these special fats must be supplied from outside the body every day, from foods and certain oils, because your body can%26#039;t manufacture them on its own. There are two %26quot;parent%26quot; forms of EFAs that allow your body to make whatever it needs from them, i.e., various types of EFA %26quot;derivatives%26quot;. Parent omega-6 is termed linoleic acid (LA), and parent omega-3 is termed alpha-linolenic acid (ALA).

For tables of EFA-containing oils, shown with their percentages of parent omega-6 to parent omega-3, as well as of some EFA derivatives, see http://www.BrianPeskin/Nexus.com. With all the hoopla about olive oil, I want you to know that it contains mainly omega-9, a non-essential oil that your body itself makes. %26quot;Extra virgin%26quot; olive oil is traditionally unprocessed and therefore not cancer-causing, but it won%26#039;t protect you against contracting cancer in the least. Avoid margarine: it won%26#039;t go bad even when kept out of the fridge. This is the proof of hydrogenated oil%26#039;s failure to oxygenate. If it still could oxygenate when eaten, it would turn rancid when left unrefrigerated–just like fish does. Canola and soy oils are not recommended; neither was ever meant for human consumption but as food for farm animals or for industrial applications. Many foods, especially salad dressings, now contain canola oil. You should try to avoid it.

The oils must be uncooked, or at the very least only slightly heated, to retain their important nutritional properties. Also bear in mind that some supplement manufacturers%26#039; labels fail to separately identify and distinguish the parent EFAs from the EFA derivatives. It may be impossible to tell whether you are getting the parent EFAs or the EFA derivatives. Make certain of what you%26#039;re getting before you purchase it. Make sure the oils are raw, unprocessed and organic and that they do not contain fish oil or any hydrogenated oils.

Omega-6 versus omega-3 ratios in the body

We must look at the tissue content of our bodies to determine what oils contain the best anti-cancer EFAs. It is known from pathology studies that the brain and nervous system have a ratio of one part omega-6 to one part omega-3 (1:1). Some nutritionists suggest that this ratio is best, but they are wrong. Here%26#039;s why.

Most organs contain a 4:1 omega-6 to omega-3 ratio. However, the brain, nervous system and organs comprise only about 12% of body weight. Skin is 100% parent omega-6 and contains no omega-3;35 it comprises about 4% of body weight. The muscles comprise at least 50% of total body weight and are the prime factor to account for in determining the required parent omega-6 to omega-3 ratio. A key fact about muscle structure is that muscle contains from 5.5 to 7.5 times more omega-6 than omega-3, depending on the degree of physical condition.36 We are warned about %26quot;overdosing%26quot; on omega-6 in our diets and told that we must take lots of oils containing omega-3 to compensate. We are told that we are ingesting upwards of 20 times too much omega-6. This is wrong, and there is much more to the analysis.

Scientifically, you need an organic supplement with a ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 of 1:1 up to 2.5:1. With this powerfully effective ratio, you only require a minimum amount of 3-4 grams on a daily basis. This ratio is significantly different than your physician, health practitioner or writers on popular nutritional publications will likely suggest: they simply don%26#039;t know and understand the basis of it. Their analysis consists of a significant number of errors, and I hope you will review the paper %26quot;The Scientific Calculation of the Optimum Omega 6/3 Ratio%26quot; at http://www.BrianPeskin.com (click on %26quot;EFA Report%26quot;) so you will understand this as well as the science behind the calculation of the ideal omega-6 to omega-3 ratio.

Today, people automatically think of fish oil or flax oil as the anti-cancer solution. Following these incorrect recommendations is a significant factor in why America%26#039;s cancer rates continue to skyrocket in spite of millions of people taking these oils. Fish oil, with an overdose of omega-3 series derivatives, can actually be cancer-causing-the opposite of what we desire–and flax oil contains far too much parent omega-3.

Most parent omegas do not get converted to derivatives; they remain in the cell membranes and tissues in original parent form. Few scientists understand this and few medical texts explain it.37 Furthermore, commercial food processing destroys a significant amount of these EFAs, along with their oxygenating ability.

EFA-containing foods in the diet

Here%26#039;s a representative listing of categories of foods containing these essential oils. It is imperative to understand that these foods must be grown organically and, if necessary, processed with low heat and no artificial preservatives-otherwise the EFAs will be ruined, like the trans-fat, hydrogenated, cancer-causing oils you%26#039;ve heard about. Compare your diet and these EFA-containing foods. Are you getting enough of them?

Dairy/eggs/cheese: %26quot;Raw milk%26quot; cheeses and organic eggs are excellent sources of EFAs. Pasteurised (heated) milk is deficient in EFAs and is detrimental to infants.

Meats: Organically raised and processed chicken, beef (grass-fed is best38), lamb, pork, etc. are rich sources of EFAs. Animal-based protein is also important for obtaining anti-cancer vitamins and minerals and for producing strong haemoglobin which enables oxygen transportation.

Nuts: Organic, unprocessed raw almonds, walnuts, peanuts, cashews, etc.

Seafood: Shrimp (prawns), fish, lobster, crab, clams, oysters, etc. It is important to understand that consuming lots of seafood is not the anti-cancer answer. Seafood is overly abundant in both parent and derivative omega-3 EFAs. Fish, especially farmed fish, contains mostly omega-3 derivatives; farmed fish and oil from farmed fish are to be avoided.

Seeds: Organic sunflower, sesame, flax, pumpkin, etc.

The following foods do not contain usable EFAs for humans:

Fruits and vegetables: Animals with multiple stomachs can extract EFAs out of plant-based cellulose like grass, but humans, with only one stomach, cannot. Even if we could extract the EFAs, we could never eat the volume required to get enough.

Grains/cereals: Humans cannot extract the EFAs from them.

The miracle of EFA %26quot;oxygen magnets%26quot;

Think of these polyunsaturated EFAs as %26quot;oxygen magnets%26quot;. The proof of this fact is buried in the world%26#039;s leading medical textbooks and medical journals such as Harper%26#039;s Illustrated Biochemistry, 26th edition,40 and Human Nutrition Clinical Nutrition, July 1984.41

EFAs are integral to the structure and function of cellular respiration. Without high respiration efficiency, cancer is soon to follow. These EFA oxygen magnets in the cell membrane attract the oxygen that%26#039;s in the bloodstream and transfer it into the cell, just like little oxygen sponges. This process is supposed to be happening in each of the body%26#039;s 100 trillion cells.

So, no matter how much you breathe or exercise, if you don%26#039;t have the proper functional EFAs at the cellular level then your cells will not absorb enough oxygen from your bloodstream and you will be that much more susceptible to cancer. Remember that the cancer %26quot;threshold%26quot; is a 35% decrease in cellular oxygen.

Without a continuing new supply of these EFAs from food, cellular oxygen transfer is significantly reduced. Imagine what would happen if you had 100 trillion cells that were all deficient in a vital substance they required to be able to absorb oxygen.

Here%26#039;s an example showing how these essential fats absorb oxygen. At the supermarket, fish goes bad in only a few days because the oil in the fish is highly oxygen-absorbing-it reacts rapidly with the oxygen in the air. Fish spoils rapidly because the EFA-containing oil has the capacity to absorb lots of oxygen. This chemical process is called oxidation. This is also true with other types of essential fats. They do their job of absorbing oxygen, but because of it they have a limited life. They simply won%26#039;t work after a short period. EFAs become %26quot;spent%26quot;, i.e., rancid. That%26#039;s why they need to be replaced every day from our food-Nature designed us this way.

There are many ways to add additional oxygen to the bloodstream, such as by exercising, drinking %26quot;oxygenated%26quot; water or breathing purer air. However, these partial solutions are insufficient for maximum anti-cancer protection. When the EFA deficiency is solved, every organ becomes its own %26quot;oxygen magnet%26quot;, just as Nature intended.

Breast cancer and oxygen deficiency

Breast cancer is the number-one cancer plague to women worldwide. The growing incidence of breast cancer can be explained for the first time in light of Dr Warburg%26#039;s discovery about lack of oxygen to the cells.

The breasts consist of an exceptionally high amount of fatty tissue. A typical cell membrane in muscle tissue is half-fat and contains about one-third EFAs (oxygen transferors). However, fatty tissue like the breast contains areas of 80-95% fat concentration. These fatty components of breast tissue require and should have high EFA concentrations, but because of modern food processing they don%26#039;t. Because important organs such as the brain, heart, lungs and kidneys require EFAs on a priority basis, there may not be enough left over to ensure that breast tissue receives an adequate amount of EFAs.

Therefore, oxygen deficiency in the breast tissue will be very significant.

Given this premise, we can deduce that breast tissue should and would be the number-one expected cancer site in women worldwide, and it is. This conclusion makes so much sense in explaining the massive rise in breast cancer rates. Harvard%26#039;s Dr W. C. Willett gives us the proof. In a study on the intake of parent omega-6 involving over 80,000 nurses, it was shown that the group with the lowest intake of linoleic acid (parent omega-6) exhibited the highest incidence of breast cancer (NEJM 1987; 316(1):22-28).42

Has your ob-gyn told you that you need this miraculous anti-cancer nutrient? I doubt it; he or she probably doesn%26#039;t know.

Fish oil won%26#039;t stop heart disease

Surprisingly, it was known back in 1979 that diet influenced EFA composition of the cell membrane; this finding was published in Cancer Research (1979; 39:1726-32).43 In 1990, a masterpiece of research conducted by William E. Lands found that the amount of critical parent omega-6 in the tissues was dependent on diet (Lipids 1990; 25(9):505-16).44

To gain the best in scientific research, in 2002 I attended the world%26#039;s 1st Essential Fatty Acids and Human Nutrition and Health International Conference in Shanghai, China.

There I discovered a shocking and unexpected discovery that fish oil lowers immunity. I nearly fell out of my chair! Overdosing on fish oil supplements can significantly decrease the effectiveness of your immune system, increasing your risk of contracting cancer. The International Society for the Study of Fatty Acids and Lipids (ISSFAL) June 2000 Congress in Tsukuba, Japan,45 had reported this startling fact, as noted earlier.

And don%26#039;t think that fish oil prevents heart disease. It doesn%26#039;t. Cardiovascular Research (2002; 54:183-190) reported on a study where both the fish oil group and the control group showed close to equal atherosclerotic progression (arteries getting more clogged in spite of taking fish oil supplements). Nor did fish oil stop thickening of the artery. On the contrary, the artery wall got thicker (worsened) with fish oil ingestion! A mere 1.65 grams per day of fish oil supplement was taken-a great enough dose to cause adverse immunity and excessive internal bleeding, too.46

These results showing the failure of fish oil were published in 2002. Did this stop %26quot;experts%26quot; in the nutritional and medical fields and even in our governments from declaring how great fish oil supplements are? No!

Harvard Medical School was involved in a study, published in 1995, titled %26quot;Controlled Trial of Fish Oil for Regression of Human Coronary Atherosclerosis%26quot; (Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25(7):1492-8).47

The daily dose was six grams of fish oil versus six grams of olive oil in the control group. Their conclusion? %26quot;Fish oil treatment for two years does not promote major favorable changes in the diameter of atherosclerotic coronary arteries%26quot; (author%26#039;s emphasis). This means that arterial clogging was not decreased with the fish oil supplements.

Omega-6 derivative AA prevents blood clotting

Dr Warburg understood that slow blood speed allowed cancer to metastasise. Later, other researchers showed that if you can keep a localised cancer from metastasising, your risk of dying from cancer decreases by an amazing tenfold! Even though you may have cancer, you won%26#039;t die from it. Blood speed and viscosity have a connection to the spread of cancer. This is a surprising, seldom-mentioned fact that was pointed out by world-renowned molecular biologist Robert Weinberg.49

What causes metastasis? Blood clots, and this is known, too.50 What prevents blood from %26quot;sticking together%26quot; and is also Nature%26#039;s natural blood-thinner that prevents blood clots? No, it%26#039;s not omega-3, like you are constantly told. Parent omega-6 is much more powerful. Arachidonic acid (AA) is a critical omega-6 derivative and major biochemical component which occurs in virtually every cell we have. It is the building block of the most potent anti-aggregatory (%26quot;helps blood thinning%26quot;) agent known, termed prostacyclin. AA also inhibits platelet adhesion, making it a natural %26quot;blood thinner%26quot;. AA even helps solve vascular problems as a response to injury.51

Heart attack victims often have depleted EFA levels, especially the EFA derivatives AA from parent omega-6 and EPA from parent omega-3.56 We need some parent omega-3 because EPA is one of its important derivatives. The problem is that fish oil supplements overdose us with far too much.

What%26#039;s really clogging the arteries

Contrary to what we have heard for decades, it is not the saturated fat that clogs the arteries and impedes blood flow: it%26#039;s the adulterated parent omega-6.

A groundbreaking Lancet article (1994; 344:1195-96) reported investigating the components of arterial plaques. Felton et al. measured the individual components, and in an aortic artery clog they found over 10 different compounds but no saturated fat.57 There was some cholesterol in the clog. This is explained by the fact that cholesterol acts as a protective healer for arterial cuts and bruises, just like a scab forms over external cuts.

What is the predominant component of a clog? You probably guessed it: the adulterated omega-6 polyunsaturated oils-those that start out containing properly functioning EFAs but get ruined during commercial food processing. Many similar analyses of arterial clogs showing the same result have been carried out and published in the medical journals, but it would seem that few physicians have seen them.58 The average person has little, if any, chance of ever discovering the truth.

So, it is not cholesterol itself that clogs the arteries. If you have a deficiency of EFAs, cholesterol acts as a %26quot;poison delivery system%26quot;. EFAs are cholesterol%26#039;s major component. As the medical textbook Molecular Biology of the Cell makes clear (p. 481), cholesterol is necessary for the structural integrity of the lipid bi-layer, the matrix in each of our 100 trillion cell membranes. JAMA (1994; 272:1335-40) published an article stating that cholesterol-lowering drugs do not work significantly to prevent heart disease. The reason? They can%26#039;t lower the amount of defective parent omega-6 enough.

As stated in Current Atherosclerosis Reports (2004; 6:477-84), this is why cholesterol drugs can%26#039;t do the job:59 %26quot;LDL contains up to 80% lipids [fats and oils], including polyunsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol, mainly esters. Linoleic acid (LA), one of the most abundant fatty acids in LDLÉ%26quot;

With this information, we see that it is what the cholesterol is transporting-the adulterated EFAs-that is the problem. An article in Human Nutrition: Clinical Nutrition (1984; 38C:245-260) further verifies that it is parent omega-6 that makes up most of the fatty acids in LDL and HDL cholesterol.60

Don%26#039;t let anyone ever tell you that natural fats are %26quot;bad%26quot;. One hundred trillion cells need lots of EFA-containing natural fats; in particular, lots of parent omega-6.

If just a little of this parent omega-6 is defective, reducing its ability to absorb oxygen and perform other cellular functions, it acts as a direct cause of cancer as well as heart disease. °

Must watch video

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=…

and then

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVtqTQEQs…

This plan%26#039;s continuation is in CODEX Alimentarius ….

http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.ph…

Stop Codex: Protect Health Freedom :: HealthFreedomUSA.org

http://www.parc.gov.pk/fqnp.html

PARC || FQNP at NARC

http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/ind…

CODEX ALIMENTARIUS

Codex Alimentarius

Current mood: awake

Category: Food and Restaurants

Codex Alimentarius is to be implemented on December 31, 2009. As if there weren%26#039;t already enough unnatural ingredients in foods that have names you can%26#039;t easily pronounce (nor know why they are in the food in the first place). Please check out HealthFreedomUSA to learn more about the coming implementation of this %26quot;nutricidal%26quot; plan.

According to the video of Dr. Laibow discussing Codex, there is A LOT of deception regarding Codex. Dr. Laibow exposes this deception and what will happen if Codex is not stopped.

PLEASE become informed %26amp; pass this along!|||This is unfounded and the use of oils in prostate cancer may worsen the condition. For other cancers and conditions, the diet is sound from a nutritional standpoint although unsupported by peer review as a cure for cancer. However, it should do no harm. But there is no miracle cure.|||Breaking news! You%26#039;re an idiot!|||Thank you, I%26#039;m sure it will be a big help to many. I%26#039;ll pass it on to as many as I can.|||Screams %26quot;quack%26quot; from sentence one.

Cancer isn%26#039;t one ailment, it%26#039;s an entire family, maybe several families, of diseases.|||That%26#039;s actually really unhealthy %26amp; may actually cause cancer in the future

« Previous PageNext Page »